Hello readers!
In the past posts I've mentioned that I've been working on silent film as a part of our studies.
Actually, a few weeks ago I wrote this:
"Our silent film project, which our crew started months ago, has been finished and publicly viewed. It was great and it got great feedback. Among the best, hands down."
I promised to you that I shall write more about making of this film. And here I go.
Our first practical assignment (after some theoretical studies) had indeed been to make a short silent film, to give us understanding on how things work in practice. Our first approach towards making visual productions. Our camera and lighting teacher insisted that those films should be completely understandable without sound (which presented challenges to some groups), and they shouldn't be more than 2-3 minutes long. Otherwise there were no restrictions or supervision. Group members were selected in random.
After a short brainstorming within my group, we settled on an idea of mine about a man who's trapped in a room. But it was my co-workers, A and L, who came up with the idea of this worst-case-of-morning-after-scenario. I was a bit conservative, as I'd harbored my idea for some time, and I always saw it as a sort of tragedy. But their idea had more potential, and I bent. Style of the result is something of a tragicomic.
We finished the script in a few days and soon started filming, and were first group to do so. Our work distribution went so that I directed and edited, A acted and L shot the film.
Our silent film took place almost entirely in a bathroom and we used L's bathroom for it. The place presented some challenges with its tightness. Bathroom was about 2 meters wide and 3 meters long. And into that space we had to fit a camera and its stand, two to three lights with their respective stands, props, actor and camerawoman, and only the actor could be seen in the shot.
What that meant in practice was, that every time I wanted L to shoot from a different angle, we had to move everything to create sufficient room for the camera in its new location.
Every effin' time.
Good thing we decided early on to shoot every scene first from one side, and then the next day from the other, to reduce the unnecessary work to its minimum. Third day of shooting was for supplemental shots.
The highlight of the movie was to be a montage (not the soviet one). First I imagined it to be from a single angle, but in the end we did it from three different ones. The montage was a great success.
In the end, the shootings came together quite nicely. Sure there we some troubles. We had to shoot many scenes again and again until I was satisfied, and the bathroom setting was a bit challenging with the ceramic tiles and reflecting glare. We broke one lamp, and had to wait for some time for a correct weather for the only outdoors shot. Of course the camera's memory card run out in the middle of the shooting. And as said, we had to move all the equipment every time we moved the camera.
But those were minor complaints. Things could have gone much worse. Our team worked together better than I could have hoped for. We finished sooner than other groups had started.
Then came the editing. The part of the movie making I had waited the most. I had done some editing earlier during high school, and fell in love with it. But the editing part was also the hardest. Part of the fault goes to our schedules. We finished shooting so early, that many parts of the editing process was still to be taught. And I was too impatient to wait for others.
For example, we had a ton of material to work with, which is ideal. But I didn't know how to tag or color code material. So, when I wanted to find a specific shot, I either had to rely on my memory, or to scroll through everything we had filmed.
The editing process took longer than the filming. We filmed Exodus within three days, all together about 7-8 hours of work (a lot for a 2-3 minute film). I edited it for more than 10 hours. Partly because I didn't know "the fast way", partly because I am a perfectionist.
A large chunk of time went to color correction. Another thing that was still to be taught, but our Exodus desperately needed color correction, as some shots were very yellowish, others more greenish. So I self-learned how to correct colors, and did it. Yet again, my way wasn't the most efficient or the most accurate, but it eventually got the job done.
I had to slow down, speed up, mix, match and create mirror images of some of the shots, but finally the work was done and I was satisfied. The running time vastly exceeded the instructed 2-3 minutes: Exodus still is 5.5 minutes long.
I thought the title to be "Exit", but A came up with "Exodus", which was so pompous and grand and biblical that we had to choose it. When naming our characters for the credits, A and me came up with another Bible reference, which basically made to whole film into a Bible adaption. Which is funny because earlier when someone asked me what the film was about, I said that we were making a movie version of the Bible.
(Like this: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060164/)
Anyway, Exodus was successful. Our teacher liked it very much, and it was among the better silent films our class made.
I think we are supposed to make audio to the flick in the future, but that's yet to pass. I let you know about that process as well.
J.
And here's the silent film itself. I give you... our first silent film... Exodus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0_rhIgUhfw
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti